changed js_throw_type_error ES5 workaround to be more compatible with test262

This commit is contained in:
Fabrice Bellard 2025-04-10 15:37:19 +02:00
parent c505ac0f39
commit d546fbfdb7
3 changed files with 7 additions and 35 deletions

2
TODO
View File

@ -62,6 +62,6 @@ Optimization ideas:
Test262o: 0/11262 errors, 463 excluded
Test262o commit: 7da91bceb9ce7613f87db47ddd1292a2dda58b42 (es5-tests branch)
Result: 39/76964 errors, 3147 excluded, 6912 skipped
Result: 35/76964 errors, 3147 excluded, 6912 skipped
Test262 commit: 56e77d6325067a545ea7e8ff5be5d9284334e33c

View File

@ -14721,21 +14721,15 @@ static __exception int js_operator_delete(JSContext *ctx, JSValue *sp)
return 0;
}
static JSValue js_throw_type_error(JSContext *ctx, JSValueConst this_val,
int argc, JSValueConst *argv)
{
return JS_ThrowTypeError(ctx, "invalid property access");
}
/* XXX: not 100% compatible, but mozilla seems to use a similar
implementation to ensure that caller in non strict mode does not
throw (ES5 compatibility) */
static JSValue js_function_proto_caller(JSContext *ctx, JSValueConst this_val,
int argc, JSValueConst *argv)
static JSValue js_throw_type_error(JSContext *ctx, JSValueConst this_val,
int argc, JSValueConst *argv)
{
JSFunctionBytecode *b = JS_GetFunctionBytecode(this_val);
if (!b || (b->js_mode & JS_MODE_STRICT) || !b->has_prototype) {
return js_throw_type_error(ctx, this_val, 0, NULL);
if (!b || (b->js_mode & JS_MODE_STRICT) || !b->has_prototype || argc >= 1) {
return JS_ThrowTypeError(ctx, "invalid property access");
}
return JS_UNDEFINED;
}
@ -50719,16 +50713,14 @@ void JS_AddIntrinsicBaseObjects(JSContext *ctx)
ctx->throw_type_error = JS_NewCFunction(ctx, js_throw_type_error, NULL, 0);
/* add caller and arguments properties to throw a TypeError */
obj1 = JS_NewCFunction(ctx, js_function_proto_caller, NULL, 0);
JS_DefineProperty(ctx, ctx->function_proto, JS_ATOM_caller, JS_UNDEFINED,
obj1, ctx->throw_type_error,
ctx->throw_type_error, ctx->throw_type_error,
JS_PROP_HAS_GET | JS_PROP_HAS_SET |
JS_PROP_HAS_CONFIGURABLE | JS_PROP_CONFIGURABLE);
JS_DefineProperty(ctx, ctx->function_proto, JS_ATOM_arguments, JS_UNDEFINED,
obj1, ctx->throw_type_error,
ctx->throw_type_error, ctx->throw_type_error,
JS_PROP_HAS_GET | JS_PROP_HAS_SET |
JS_PROP_HAS_CONFIGURABLE | JS_PROP_CONFIGURABLE);
JS_FreeValue(ctx, obj1);
JS_FreeValue(ctx, js_object_seal(ctx, JS_UNDEFINED, 1, (JSValueConst *)&ctx->throw_type_error, 1));
ctx->global_obj = JS_NewObject(ctx);

View File

@ -1,26 +1,6 @@
test262/test/annexB/language/comments/single-line-html-close-first-line-1.js:1: unexpected error type: SyntaxError: unexpected token in expression: '>'
test262/test/annexB/language/comments/single-line-html-close-first-line-2.js:1: unexpected error type: SyntaxError: unexpected token in expression: '>'
test262/test/annexB/language/comments/single-line-html-close-first-line-3.js:1: unexpected error type: SyntaxError: unexpected token in expression: '>'
test262/test/built-ins/Function/prototype/arguments/prop-desc.js:31: Test262Error: Function.prototype.arguments property getter/setter are the same function Expected SameValue(«function () {
[native code]
}», «function () {
[native code]
}») to be true
test262/test/built-ins/Function/prototype/arguments/prop-desc.js:31: strict mode: Test262Error: Function.prototype.arguments property getter/setter are the same function Expected SameValue(«function () {
[native code]
}», «function () {
[native code]
}») to be true
test262/test/built-ins/Function/prototype/caller/prop-desc.js:29: Test262Error: Caller property getter/setter are the same function Expected SameValue(«function () {
[native code]
}», «function () {
[native code]
}») to be true
test262/test/built-ins/Function/prototype/caller/prop-desc.js:29: strict mode: Test262Error: Caller property getter/setter are the same function Expected SameValue(«function () {
[native code]
}», «function () {
[native code]
}») to be true
test262/test/language/destructuring/binding/keyed-destructuring-property-reference-target-evaluation-order-with-bindings.js:73: Test262Error: Actual [binding::source, binding::sourceKey, sourceKey, get source, binding::defaultValue, binding::varTarget] and expected [binding::source, binding::sourceKey, sourceKey, binding::varTarget, get source, binding::defaultValue] should have the same contents.
test262/test/language/expressions/assignment/destructuring/iterator-destructuring-property-reference-target-evaluation-order.js:42: Test262Error: Actual [source, iterator, target, target-key, target-key-tostring, iterator-step, iterator-done, set] and expected [source, iterator, target, target-key, iterator-step, iterator-done, target-key-tostring, set] should have the same contents.
test262/test/language/expressions/assignment/destructuring/iterator-destructuring-property-reference-target-evaluation-order.js:42: strict mode: Test262Error: Actual [source, iterator, target, target-key, target-key-tostring, iterator-step, iterator-done, set] and expected [source, iterator, target, target-key, iterator-step, iterator-done, target-key-tostring, set] should have the same contents.